Why it's ok that Ben Parker, and the Waynes are perfect

One thing that long time comic book readers have probably noticed is how often the parents of superheroes are depicted as being perfect. This isn't always the case but often when a comic does focus on a superhero's parent(s) their flaws are ignored or not portrayed to the extent that you would be forgiven for thinking that they lacked any. 

You might think that I should be writing why this is a problem. Generally speaking characters who exist to be perfect are less interesting than their flawed counterparts. It is through a character's flaws that we see their struggles and their journey as characters. Character flaws also allow us to better relate to a character as we can see our flaws in them. 

So why am I in favour of a certain group of characters being without flaws? To answer that question I need to examine the roll that these characters play in the stories in which they appear. 

First I will look at the example of deceased 

I'm not saying that deceased characters should be perfect, in Harry Potter we only really start to see Dumbledore's flaws after his death and the reveals give us a greater appreciation of his character. The fact that these characters die as part of a backstory is key to my argument. 

Because the parents of superheroes often die in their offspring's backstory what we see of them is almost always through flashbacks or expanded backstory. This means that from a certain point on wards we are only experiencing these characters through the interpretation of their children. 

Take Thomas Wayne and Martha Wayne for example. Bruce Wayne's age is depicted as being anywhere from eight to twelve/thirteen when Thomas and Martha Wayne are killed in front of him. Because of this Bruce sees them the way he did when he was a child. Not only that but because he was only a child when it happened he would be getting a lot of his information on the type of people his parents were from stories about their actions or people who knew them personally. In the case of the former they will be stories deigned with certain angles in mind, and therefore not likely to give a fair and balanced fair of who the Waynes were. In the case of the latter he is unlikely to hear the negative aspects because the teller (say Alfred for argument's sake) aren't going to want to dwell on mistakes that the Waynes may have made because they were very dear to them, and they miss them. 

This aspect also explains why figures like Ben Parker are portrayed as perfect even though Parker is older than Bruce was when they wen't through their similar losses. In Parker's case he is going to want to focus on the positives of his uncle because that is naturally would he would focus on, and not just because of his feelings of guilt over the circumstances of his uncle's death. 

 "Everyday the future grows a little bit darker, but the past even the grimy bits, just keeps getting brighter" ~ Sally Jupiter, Watchmen

But what about living parental figures? The best character to use as an example for this is May Parker. In an event with Kevin Smith, Stan Lee said that he came up with the character of May to give Spider-Man someone to worry about. As readers we see May through the eyes of Spider-Man and this view is tinted by his worry and concern for her. This view of May is as complete as Bruce Wayne's view of his parents and isn't a full picture of who she is.

Spider-Man often worries about what would happen if May were to find out both the full circumstances of her late husband's death and his identity as Spider-Man. Yet in one comic she finds out both of those things and she is able to deal with them. Because she is much stronger than Spider-Man's fears allow him to give her credit for. This highlights the imperfect nature of the lens through which we perceive her character.

In Superhero comics parents and parental figures are often depicted as perfect. This is not however because their writers are lazy, or because the characters themselves are two dimensional. They are seen this way because we are witnessing these characters through the minds of their loved ones. In this capacity they serve as reflections of the hero's mental state. They show us what example the hero is trying to live up to, and also what they have lost or still fear to lose.

Post mortem: Thomas Wayne of Earth 2 (New 52)

This article contains content that could be considered spoilers for  Earth 2 #1, Earth 2 Annual #2 and Convergence #3

One thing that we do not suffer a lack of in superhero comics is character deaths. It would be an exaggeration to say this is on the same level as, say Game of Thrones but they happen enough that a superhero dying has become a recognisable trend of comic books, especially in a big event.

The goal of a post mortem article is to look at character deaths in comic books and examine whether or not they were any good. It should be stated that I will not be looking at the merit of the stories that the deaths occur in, merely the deaths themselves. In my opinion there is no better way to illustrate that distinction than by looking at the death of Earth 2's (New 52) second Batman, Thomas Wayne.

The Thomas Wayne of Earth 2 was killed off in the third issue of recent mini series, Convergence. He dies fighting against various Batman villains from the pre-Flashpoint DC universe. He puts up a fight but is quickly overcome and sets off an explosion, killing the villains but also himself. In my opinion it is a fitting end for the character, one that brings his story threads to a natural end rather than disrupt them.

So why do I think this? The answer can be found in Thomas' back story.

Thomas' back story, as well as his motivation are explained in Earth 2 annual #2. In that issue the reader is shown that Thomas is a character defined by regret. Martha was murdered in front of Thomas and Bruce because of Thomas' connections to, and involvement with Gotham's organised crime (specifically the drugs trade). Batman chose a life as Batman, in part because Thomas faked his own death and Bruce did not find out that he survived the shooting until much later. Because of his decision to stay away from his son and pursue revenge his son disowned him when they were eventually reunited. To put it simply, every major decision Thomas Wayne made in his life only served to hurt, and fragment his family. He attended his son's wedding in secret and could only see Bruce and his family from afar. He was unable to make amends before Bruce's death in Earth 2#1. It is because of his regret that Thomas takes on the mantle of Batman. As a character he is defined by this regret. The character is so consumed by this desire to make amends that he uses Miracolo, effectively a superhuman steroid. The character has a history of drug addiction and is aware that Miracolo is a new addiction but claims he wouldn't be able to be Batman without it. Just like Bruce Wayne's Batman is consumed by his desire for vengeance, often at the cost of his own health, Thomas Wayne is consumed by a desire for redemption.

By the time of his death in Convergence 3# all of this issues have been resolved to one degree or another. Thomas Wayne's death in Convergence serves as a swan song to the character. Without any Miracolo to rely on he his forced to face overwhelming odds on his own strength and dies taking down a sizable chunk of Batman's pre Flashpoint rogues gallery with him. In this fight he is no longer a man seeking to wash away his mistakes as a husband and a father, but a man heroically defending his family.

Thomas Wayne's death also ties into the themes of the story in which it takes place. Convergence takes place in between the destruction of the old (New 52) Earth 2 and the establishment of the new Earth 2 that is the focus of Earth 2: Society. In this series Thomas serves as a brief mentor to Earth 2' Dick Grayson, who is inspired to take up the mantle of Batman after Thomas' death (Batmen drop like flies on Earth 2). Just as Convergence serves to bridge the gap between the original Earth 2 comic book series and Earth 2: Society, Thomas serves to bridge the gap between the original Earth 2 Batman and the new one. His death can be seen within a wider context of the last hurrah of the old series before the coming of the new series.

In my opinion killing off Thomas Wayne was not just a good way to end his story it was the most appropriate way to end his story. Both for the character, and the story. Unlike many character deaths which have been used for pure shock value or to raise the profile of a series Thomas' death genuinely serves the series in which it takes place.

Rather than close with a concluding argument I think I will let Dick Grayon's words from the comic itself explain why I believe the death to be such a fitting end for the character.